A practical walkthrough for connecting multiple shelf and vision cameras to a single edge gateway without overloading it.

Running inference on every camera individually gets expensive and hard to manage past a handful of units. Consolidating multiple camera feeds onto a single edge gateway reduces per-camera cost and centralizes management, but it introduces a new problem: making sure the gateway's processing budget doesn't get overwhelmed. Here's a practical deployment sequence.
Before connecting a single camera, total up the expected frame rate and resolution across every feed you plan to run through the gateway, and check that figure against the gateway's rated throughput - an EdgeForce gateway's specification sheet lists throughput in operations per second, which you can roughly map against your model's per-frame cost. Underestimating this step is the most common cause of dropped frames and inconsistent alert timing after deployment.
Not every camera feed needs the same frame rate. A shelf camera from VisiTech tracking slow-moving inventory changes can run effective analysis at a much lower frame rate than an Optisight entry-counting camera at a busy doorway. Configure lower priority feeds to sample less frequently, freeing processing headroom for the feeds where timing actually matters.
Run cameras to the gateway over PoE where possible - it simplifies cabling and avoids the reliability issues that come with WiFi-connected cameras dropping frames under network congestion. Keep the gateway's uplink to your central system on a separate network segment from the camera feeds themselves, so a burst of camera traffic doesn't compete with the alerts and metadata you're trying to send upstream.
Assign models to camera feeds based on the gateway's remaining capacity after your highest-priority feeds are accounted for, and run a load test with all cameras active simultaneously before going live - many issues that don't appear with two or three test cameras only surface once every planned camera is streaming at once. Watch for processing queue backlog specifically, since it's a leading indicator of an overloaded gateway well before frames actually start dropping.
Once live, monitor per-camera latency rather than just overall gateway health - a single misbehaving camera feed (often one with a lens issue causing constant false detections) can consume a disproportionate share of processing budget and degrade performance for every other feed on the same gateway. Rebalancing which cameras share a gateway, rather than simply adding more compute, is often the more cost-effective fix.
A well-planned multi-camera gateway deployment scales more cheaply than one inference device per camera, but only if the processing budget is planned upfront rather than discovered through trial and error after installation.